[esp-r] Re: xml report problem

[Achim Geissler]

Hi Sara

all I can say is that this is a reported bug (in any case, I reported it to core_developers some time in April).

However, I only had problems for the summary file, not the hourly data file. I am also not really sure what effect "flat" vs. "tree" really has / had. The code does seem to treat "flat" quite tersely (see TReportsManager.cpp, lines 2202 ff. as a likely place where things may be going wrong).

Best
Achim



On Aug 6, 2013, at 8:11 PM, "Sara Nikoofard" <sr880710 at dal.ca> wrote:

> Hi All,
>  
> I have a problem with xml reporting. I am using the latest version of development_branch which uses the new xml reporting format (h3kmodule.f90 and Addtoreport function). When I define the value of <hierarchy> as tree, I can see the results in my xml report but when I change it to flat it doesn’t give me anything other than the names of variables in xml reporting. I didn’t have this problem with add_to_xml_reporting function before. Any idea what I can do to get the same result as before with flat value for <hierarchy>.
>  
> I attached the input.xml and xml report with flat value for new format (1178A00245_flat_new.xml.orig) and xml report with flat value with old format ((1178A00245.xml.orig) that I want to get.
>  
> Thanks,
> Sara
> -------------------------------------------------------------
> Sara Nikoofard, PhD
> Postdoctoral fellow
> Mechanical Engineering Department, Room C254B
> Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS
> Phone: (902) 494-3165
> email: s.nikoofard at dal.ca
>  
>  
> <1178A00245.xml.orig><1178A00245_flat_new.xml.orig><input.xml>_______________________________________________
> esp-r mailing list
> esp-r at lists.strath.ac.uk
> http://lists.strath.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/esp-r

achim.geissler at intergga.ch




-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.strath.ac.uk/archives/esp-r/attachments/20130806/ca1a1ea4/attachment.html