<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD><TITLE></TITLE>
<META content="text/html; charset=us-ascii" http-equiv=Content-Type>
<META name=GENERATOR content="MSHTML 8.00.6001.18975"></HEAD>
<BODY><!-- Converted from text/plain format -->
<P>In my <STRONG><EM>completely uninformed</EM></STRONG> opinion, we should be
setting the occupant gains to 100% convective, unless we carefully model
interior partitions (and perhaps even furniture).<BR><BR>The actual radiant
fraction may be closer to 30%, 40% or even 50%. But few occupants have a clear
view to the envelope from all sides; much of these radiant losses will be
transferred to the ceiling, floor, interior walls and partitions, and perhaps
even furnishings. The temperatures of these surfaces will be closer to the
air-point and envelope temperatures, and (I suspect) much of the radiant
gain from the occupant will be re-convected to the interior air.</P>
<P>But that's just my two cents, and I look forward to more informed
perspectives.</P>
<P>- Alex </P>
<P><FONT color=#0000ff></FONT><BR><BR>-----Original Message-----<BR>From:
esp-r-bounces@lists.strath.ac.uk [<A
href="mailto:esp-r-bounces@lists.strath.ac.uk">mailto:esp-r-bounces@lists.strath.ac.uk</A>]
On Behalf Of Jon Hand<BR>Sent: December 14, 2010 04:22<BR>To:
esp-r@lists.strath.ac.uk<BR>Subject: [esp-r] radiant and convective split for
occupants<BR><BR><BR>I am updating some documentation about occupants in
buildings related to the radiant and convective split of sensible gains and I
find that there are a number of exemplar models that simply default to 50%
radiant. If I look at the exemplar models that come with EnergyPlus I see
most of them are setting the radiant fraction of occupants to 30% and at least
one paper mentioned 40%.<BR><BR>A Google search comes up with suggestions
for what the sensible is but mentions of how it is distributed seem to be well
hidden. In densely populated spaces this must have an impact.<BR><BR>Does
anyone have some or know about ...<BR> a) opinions that they would like to
share<BR> b) some references that discuss this<BR> c) some papers that
talk about it<BR><BR>Regards, Jon
Hand<BR>_______________________________________________<BR>esp-r mailing
list<BR>esp-r@lists.strath.ac.uk<BR><A
href="http://lists.strath.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/esp-r">http://lists.strath.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/esp-r</A><BR></P></BODY></HTML>