<html xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40">
<head>
<meta http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
<meta name=Generator content="Microsoft Word 12 (filtered medium)">
<style>
<!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0cm;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:blue;
text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:purple;
text-decoration:underline;}
span.EmailStyle17
{mso-style-type:personal-compose;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:windowtext;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;}
@page Section1
{size:612.0pt 792.0pt;
margin:72.0pt 72.0pt 72.0pt 72.0pt;}
div.Section1
{page:Section1;}
-->
</style>
<!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]-->
</head>
<body lang=EN-CA link=blue vlink=purple>
<div class=Section1>
<p class=MsoNormal>Hi all:<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class=MsoNormal>I keep seeing bits of information on the list about new file
formats that involve a more flexible tagging structure.<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class=MsoNormal>I am presently batch generating and simulating approximately
17,000 houses through ESP-r. I use templates and either add or replace lines to
be representative of each individual house.<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class=MsoNormal>My question is: has anyone begun to document their new “tagged”
format changes similar to the old “Data Model Summary (2001)”?<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class=MsoNormal>Obviously the cfg is now tagged.<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class=MsoNormal>Specifically, I have seen reference to the geo file being
tagged, and perhaps the con file and certain databases being tagged?<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class=MsoNormal>Using the preferences->upgrade_files command I could only
update the geo file.<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class=MsoNormal>There are presently some real drawbacks in the present file
structure, such as fixed spacing.<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class=MsoNormal>Thanks <o:p></o:p></p>
<p class=MsoNormal>Lukas Swan<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class=MsoNormal>Dal Univ<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class=MsoNormal>Canada<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</body>
</html>